Main menu
Appendix 1.
Lab Test Results of HIV inactivation by electric current from Appendix E Paper by W. Lyman, et al. Reporting Inactivation of AIDS Virus by Electric Current
William D. Lyman, Irwin R.Merkatz William C. Hatch and Steven C. Kaali Departments of Pathology, and Obstetrics & Gynecology Albert Einstein. College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave., Bronx, N.Y.10461
William D. Lyman, Irwin R.Merkatz William C. Hatch and Steven C. Kaali Departments of Pathology, and Obstetrics & Gynecology Albert Einstein. College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave., Bronx, N.Y.10461
SUMMARY
In this report, we present the results of double-
These experimental currents were equal to 3.85 and 7.7.ìÁ/mmcurrent densities respectively. The reduction of infectivity was dependent upon, the total electric charge (ìA x min) passing through the chamber to which the virus was exposed. Viral infectivity was determined by two independent measures: a syncytium-
There was no significant change in the percentage of viable uninfected cells exposed to any of the currents tested. Therefore, because biocompatible direct electric current attenuates the infectivity of cell-
Lastly, because the virus is being attenuated, electric current may also render treated HIV-
Key words: HIV-
INTRODUCTION
The number of individuals infected by the human immunodeficiency virus type-
In this regard, three principal approaches are currently being investigated. In order to decrease susceptibility to the consequences of infection, vaccines are being sought which will induce the production of protective antibodies (6). As treatment modalities, the use of soluble antagonists to block the receptor for HIV-
Because heat or light in combination with drugs and dyes can inactivate viruses including HIV-
As result of our interest in the use of electric current to alter biological systems , we focused our investigations on the ability of direct electrical current at biocompatible levels to alter the infectivity of HTV-
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Electrical treatment of HIV 1:
The RF strain of HIV-
After the exposure of virus to electric current, the contents of the chamber were removed and placed into sterile microtubes. Five ìl of each sample were removed and diluted with 95ìl tissue culture medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) for subsequent assays.
Syncytium-
This assay was performed as previously described by Nara et al (11). Briefly, 10CEM-
Reverse trascriptase assay:
Uninfected H9 cells, were pelleted at 1,000 rpm for minutes at room temperature, the supernatant was decanted and the cells were resuspended in 100ìl treated viral sample. The cells were incubated for up to 6 hours with the viral samples. At the end of the incubation time, the viral/cell suspensions were centrifuged at 1,000 RPM for 5 minutes and the supernatant decanted. The cell pellet was then resuspended in 5ml of RPMI, 10% FCS and placed into a T25 tissue culture flask and maintained at 37C, 5% COin a humidified chamber. At 2 day intervals (beginning at day 21ml of the cell suspensions was removed from each sample and centrifuged at 1,000 rpm for 5 minutes in order to pellet the cells. The supernatant was subsequently centrifuged at 14,000 RPM for I5 minutes. The pellet was resuspended in suspension buffer and assayed using standard methodology employing Mg+ + as the divalent cation poly (rA) oligo d(T) 12-
Known HIV positive and negative control samples were included in each assay for reference. Thirty ìl of the reacti on mixture were added to each 10 ìl viral sample and incubated at 37 C for 60 min. Samples were then incubated with 1ml of cold quench solution on ice for 15 minutes and filtered through a Millipore manifold. Chimneys were rinsed first with wash solution and followed by cold 95% ethanol. The filters were dried by vacuum and counted in scintillation fluid. Reverse transcriptase activity is expressed as counts per minute (cpm) and is considered positive only if cpm are at least five times greater than the cpm obtained with HIV negative control samples.
Biocompatibility of electric currents/time:
To determine if the electric currents used were in a biocompatibility range of energy, uninfected H9 cells were exposed to distinct currents for different amounts of time. The H9 cells were washed two times in Hanks Balance Salt Solution (HBSS). Thereafter, the cells were resuspended in RPMI, 10% FCS at a concentration of 10cells per ml, Ten ìl of the cell samples were placed into the reaction c hamber. The cell samples were then exposed to 0, 50 or 100ìA for 0, 3 or 6 minutes. At the end of each test, the cell sample was removed from the chamber and approximately 10ìl of the sample was mixed with 90ìl of trypan blue. The number of viable cells w as determined by trypan blue exclusion using a hemocytometer and tight microscope. Results are expressed as percentage of viable cells from the total of all cells. At least 200 cells per field were counted.
Statistical analysis:
Results of the syncytium-
RESULTS
Syncytium-
Using this index of HIV-
Reverse transcriptase assays:
The direct electric currents to which HIV-
Biocompatibility of the electric currents/time:
The results of a viability analysis using trypan blue exclusion criteria applied to uninfected cells exposed to the different currents and times used far these studies are shown in Table 4. The viability of H9 cells, after exposure to 100ìA fur either 3 or b minutes, did not show a significant decrease when compared to the 0 Current control. After maximum treatment at 100ìA for 6 minutes, cell viability was 93%. Interestingly, in other preliminary experiments in which HIV-
With respect to the possibility that the electric current was transduced into heat, the calculated rise in temperature within the chamber was determined to be less than 1°C. In order to verify this, a temperature microprobe was introduced into the cham ber containing tissue culture medium alone. Results of these studies are shown in Table S. Similar results were obtained when H9 cell-
DISCUSSION
The results reported here demonstrate that HIV-
The data presented in this report are based on both quantitative and quantal determinations of viral infectivity. Although the syncytium-
This belief is also supported by the results of the reverse transcriptase assays.
Although a decrease in HIV-
With respect to the biocompatibility of the electric currents and total charges reported here, two separate sets of evidence are applicable. The first has to do with the results showing that, by trypan blue exclusion, no significant cyt otoxicity was induced in by any total charge tested. The other evidence is obtained from reports which clearly indicates that the amount of electricity used for these experiments is significantly below presently used therapeutic electric currents which ar e in the milliampere range (12-
Rather than negative effects, exposure of cells to electric current may actually have positive consequences for resistance to infection in that important cellular electrochemical changes correlate with enhancement of specific enzymatic activities. In particular, a facilitation of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) and ATPase activity has been observed (12,15). Both of these enzymes are associated with the oxidative capacity of the cell. Specifically, it has been suggested that an elec trochemical reaction occurs between mitochondrial membrane-
energy resources within a cell and facil itate cell metabolism. This, in turn, may actualIy render a cell less susceptible to the effects of viral infection.
In summary, the data presented here indicate that biocompatible direct electric current significantly reduces the infectivity of HIV-
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Thanks go to Mrs. Agnes Geoghan for her excellent secretarial assistance and to Dr.Gabor, Kemeny for important technical help. Additional thanks go to Drs. Frank Lilly and Philip Aisen for their constructive criticism of this manuscript.
LEGENDS


Table 1
Experimental Paradigm
Current (ì.A). Time (Minutes)
Table 2
Effect of ELECTRIC Current on Syncytium Formation a
% of O Current Control (Ä%) b
Current (ìA) Six Minute Exposure
Table 3
Effect of Electric Current on Reverse Transcriptase Activity a
% of O Current Control (Ä%) Current (ìa) Six Minute Exposure
0 |
14812 |
25 |
24812 |
50 |
34612 |
75 |
24812 |
100 |
13412 |
0 |
100 (0) |
|
50 |
50 (- |
|
100 |
35 (- |
|
a = Value at I:160 dilution of virus. |
||
b = Value equals the mean of 3 experiments. |
||
0 |
100 (0) |
|
50 |
56 (- |
|
100 |
6 (- |
|
a = Value equals the mean of 5 experiments. The standard error of the mean in each case was less than 10% of the mean value. |
||
Table 4
Effect of Eclectic Current onViability
of Uninfected H9 Cells
(% Viable CeIIs) a
Length of exposure (Minutes),
Current (ìA) 0 3 6
Table 5
Effect of Electric Current on Temperature of
Tissue Culture Medium (°C) Length of Exposure (Minutes)
0 |
96946 |
|
50 |
989598 |
|
100 |
969793 |
|
a = At least 200 cells counted in hemocytometer field |
||
Current (ìA) |
036 |
|
0 |
191919 |
|
50 |
191919 |
|
100 |
191919 |
|
a = The temperature was monitored before, during and after exposure. Results shown are end- |
||
REFERENCES
1. Sato PA, Chin J, Mann JM. Review of AIDS and HIV infection Giobal epidermiology and statistics. AIDS 1989; 3 Suppl.1:S301-
2. Centers for Disease Control. Revision of the CDC surveillance case definition for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. MMWR 1987; 1 Suppl. 36:S1-
3. Thacker SB, Berkelman RL. Public health surveillance in the United States. Epidemiol. Rev 1988; 10:164.90.
5. Oxtoby MJ. Epidemiology of pediatric AIDS in the United States. In: Brain in Pediatric AIDS (Kozlowski PB, Snider DA, Vietze PM, Wisniewski HM, eds) 1990:1-
6. Broder S, Mitsuya H, Yarchoan R, Pavlakis GN. Antiretroviral therapy in AIDS. Ann Int Med 1990: 113:604-
7. Perno CF, Baseler MW, Broder S, Yarchoan R. Infection of monocytes by human immunodeficiency virus I blocked by inhibitors of CD4-
8. Mitsuya H, Weinhold KJ, Furman FA et al. 3'-
9. Quinnan GV, Wells MA, Wittek AE, et al. Inactivation of human T-
10. Bisaccia E, Berger C, KIainer AS. Extracorporeal photopheresis in the treatment of AIDS-
11. Nara PL, Hatch WC, Dunlop NM, et al.: Simple, rapid quantitative, syncytium-
12. Cheng N, Van Hoof H, Bockx E, et al. The effects of electric currents on ATP generation, protein synthesis, and membrane transport in rat skin. Clin Ortho ReI Res 1982; 17I:26472.
13. Frank G, Schachar N, Dittrich D, et al. Electromagnetic stimulation of ligament healing in rabbits. Clin Ortho ReI Res 1983; I75:263-
14. Eriksson E, Haggmark T. Comparison of isometric muscle training and electrical stimulation supplementing isometric muscle training in the recovery after major knee ligament surgery. Amer J Sports Med 19?9; 7:159-
15. Stanish WD, Valiant GA, Bonen A, et al. The effects of immobilization and of electrical stimulation on muscle glycogen and myofibrillar ATPase. Can J Appl Sport Sci 1982; 7:267-
16. Pills AA. Electrochemical information transfer at living cell membranes. Ann NY Acad Sci 1974; 205:148-
