Main menu
Dr. Edward C. Rosenow, MD (1875-
After the report, you can see a selection of images made with the original Rife microscope, supplied by the Rife Research group in Canada.
Observations with the Rife Microscope
of Filter-
by Dr. Edward C. Rosenow, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
Originally published August 26, 1932
Recently, I reported to the staff of the Mayo Clinic the more important observation made during three days, July 5, 6 and 7, 1932, spent in Dr. Kendall's laboratory at Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago. I went there at the invitation of Drs. Kendall and Rife, to share with them their observations in a restudy of the filter-
I would like to repeat here that portion of my report which had to do specifically with the Rife microscope.
Owing to the novel and important character of the work, each of us verified at every step the results obtained. Microscopic examinations of suitable specimens was made as a routine by Dr. Rife with his high-
The following principles and methods were stated by Dr. Rife as being essential in order to visualize clearly the objects at this and higher magnifications by direct observation. Spherical aberration is reduced to the minimum and magnification greatly increased by using objectives in place of oculars. Proper visualization, especially of unstained objects, is obtained by the use of an intense beam of monochromatic polarized light created by rotating wedge-
In my original report (Proc. Staff Meeting Mayo Clinic, 7: 408-
"There can be no question of the existence of the filterable turquoise blue bodies of Eberthella-
The findings under the Rife microscope of cocci and diplococci in filtrates of cultures of the streptococcus from poliomyelitis, and in filtrates of the viruses of poliomyelitis and herpes encephalitis, not detectable by the ordinary methods of examination, and which resembled in form and size those found in the respective cultures, and the absence of minute forms, suggest that the filterable, inciting agent of these diseases is not necessarily extremely small, as is universally believed. Indeed, the filterable, inciting agent may be the non-
It is, of course, possible that these unstained, invisible forms revealed by ordinary methods of examination are not the inciting agents or 'viruses' of these diseases and that they represent merely the filterable or other state of the streptococcus. A consideration of the great difficulty one has in isolating the streptococcus and demonstrating diplococci in lesions in these diseases and the ease with which the bodies are found in the filtrate indicate clearly that the `invisible' forms of the streptococcus, if such they be, are present in large numbers in the host, as in positive cultures of the streptococcus. Their form, size and color are too characteristic and true to type to permit considering them as artifacts or as being expressive of etiologically unrelated, contaminating streptococci. Non-
Edward C. Rosenow, Rochester, Minnesota